home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: castle.nando.net!news
- From: alexlang@nando.net (Alex Lang)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: 28.8 baud & telco responsibilities
- Date: 17 Mar 1996 22:49:26 GMT
- Organization: IBM Mwave Development
- Message-ID: <4ii4tm$e7q@castle.nando.net>
- References: <todamhyp-2802961822500001@bhppp31.bluehawk.com> <4h4kaf$dla@netaxs.com> <313E5A6E.74DE@mbr.centra.ca> <4hmtqt$9il@news2.cais.com> <313F76CA.384E@interramp.com>
- Reply-To: alexlang@nando.net (Alex Lang)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: grail1317.nando.net
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
-
- In <313F76CA.384E@interramp.com>, Richard Mork <cd001847@interramp.com> writes:
- >Southwestern Bell in Houston told me they only 'guarantee 2400 baud'.
-
- But since V.32bis uses 2400 baud at 6 bits per baud they will
- guarentee 14400 bits per second. Remember that there is a big
- difference between "bits per second" and "baud" in the brave new
- (well, actually old) world of trellis coding. In fact, using 2400
- baud at 9 bits per baud in V.34, they will guarentee 21600 bits per
- second.
-
-